Consumer studies
the state of art and research challenges
Keywords:
Bibliometrics; Consumption; Knowledge.Abstract
To advance in the construction of knowledge, researchers need to understand what has been studied on a given topic, so that it is possible to identify patterns and exceptions that allow the construction of new research propositions. Since consumption is a large and relatively mature area of study, the objective of this work is to understand the field of research in the last decade, highlighting topics of major interest, relevant authors, publication countries, among other information that may be useful for future studies in this stream. The methodology used is bibliometric techniques for collecting information from each article published in the period in the analyzed journals. We analyzed 3,373 articles from eight journals that publish on consumption in the period from 2006 to 2016. In light of the information obtained with this research, it is possible to visualize a framework for the development of the studies on consumption, providing guidance for future research.
References
Araújo, C. A. (2006). Bibliometria: evolução histórica e questões atuais. Em questão, 12(1), 11-32.
Eaton, J. P., Ward, J. C., Kumar, A., & Reingen, P. H. (1999). Structural analysis of co-author relationships and author productivity in selected outlets for consumer behavior research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(1), 39-59.
Endersby, J. W. (1996). Collaborative research in the social sciences: Multiple authorship and publication credit. Social Science Quarterly,77(2), 375-392.
Galvagno, M. (2011). The intellectual structure of the anti-consumption and consumer resistance field: An author co-citation analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1688-1701.
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Londres: Sage.
Hoffman, D. L., & Holbrook, M. B. (1993). The intellectual structure of consumer research: A bibliometric study of author cocitations in the first 15 years of the Journal of Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 505-517.
Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M. L., & Van de Sompel, H. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1462-1480.
Mendes, C. P., Pinheiro, S. S., & Troccoli, I. R. (2015). Satisfação e insatisfação do consumidor: um estudo bibliométrico nos enanpads 2006-09. InterSciencePlace, 1(17, 125-152.
Muñoz-Leiva, F. M., Viedma-del-Jesús, M. I., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & López-Herrera, A. G. (2012). An application of co-word analysis and bibliometric maps for detecting the most highlighting themes in the consumer behaviour research from a longitudinal perspective. Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1077-1095.
Osareh, F. (1996). Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: A review of literature I. Libri, 46(3), 149-158.
Phillips, D. M., Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (1999). Influence in the evolving citation network of the Journal of Consumer Research. Advances in Consumer Research, 26, 203-210.
Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981-1004.
Shaw, E. H., & Jones, D. B. (2005). A history of schools of marketing thought. Marketing theory, 5(3), 239-281.
Troccoli, I. R., Gimenez, K., Reis, P. N. C., & Faria, P. P. (2011). Comportamento do consumidor: Um estudo bibliométrico nos Enanpads 2007-09. Revista Organizações em Contexto-online, 7(14), 165-189.
Wright, R. F. (2002). A review of the four prominent marketing schools of thought. Journal of Advertising History, 26(1), 1-19.